standard: be needed in networking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in networking 1.00
be needed in computer networks 0.79
be needed in data communication 0.79
be necessary for networks 0.76
be important in communications 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in networking)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(standard, be important in communications)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)