standard: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality system 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
is good thing 0.78
be better than quantity 0.77
be bad on snapchat 0.76
be bad on instagram 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(standard, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)