standing: be fox man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, step
Weight: 0.54
, change
Weight: 0.54
Siblings stand
Weight: 0.34
, dark matter
Weight: 0.32
, spot
Weight: 0.31
, seat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fox man 1.00
be fox last man 0.97
be in robin 0.77
be in round robin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(standing, be fox man)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standing, be fox last man)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(standing, be fox last man)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(standing, be fox last man)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standing, be fox last man)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in round robin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(standing, be in round robin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(standing, be in round robin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in robin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(standing, be in robin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(standing, be in robin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(standing, be in round robin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(standing, be in robin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(standing, be fox man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(standing, be fox man)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(standing, be fox man)