standing: be in round robin decided

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.64
, matter
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, step
Weight: 0.54
, change
Weight: 0.54
Siblings stand
Weight: 0.34
, dark matter
Weight: 0.32
, spot
Weight: 0.31
, seat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in round robin decided 1.00
be in robin decided 0.97
be in round robin 0.95
be in robin 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(standing, be in round robin decided)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in robin decided)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(standing, be in robin decided)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(standing, be in robin decided)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in round robin)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(standing, be in round robin)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(standing, be in round robin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in robin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(standing, be in robin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(standing, be in robin decided)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(standing, be in robin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(standing, be in round robin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(standing, be in robin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(standing, be in round robin decided)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(standing, be in round robin decided) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(standing, be in round robin decided)