stapler: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34
, disposable razor
Weight: 0.33
, utensil
Weight: 0.33
, toaster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be at in office 0.88
be at office 0.88
be at build 0.87
be find in office 0.87
be used to build something 0.81
be at post office 0.81
be at office supply store 0.78
be at box of office supply 0.78
be used to office organization 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, be used to build something)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office build)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tool, be at office)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, be used to build something)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at office)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tool, be used to build something)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, be used to build something)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(tool, be at office)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at office build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(stapler, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at build)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(stapler, be find in office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be find in office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(stapler, be at office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(stapler, be at in office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at in office)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at in office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(stapler, be at box of office supply)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(stapler, be at post office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at box of office supply)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at post office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(stapler, be used to office organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(stapler, be find in office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at post office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at office supply store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(stapler, be at office supply store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(stapler, be at in office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at box of office supply)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at build)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(stapler, be find in office)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(stapler, be used to office organization)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office supply store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be used to office organization)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(stapler, be at build)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office supply store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(stapler, be at build)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(stapler, be at post office)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(stapler, be at box of office supply)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stapler, be used to office organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(stapler, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, be used to build something)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tool, be used to build something)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(stapler, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tool, be at office)