star: be at constellation

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talent
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, movie
Weight: 0.62
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings rock star
Weight: 0.70
, supernova
Weight: 0.69
, performer
Weight: 0.66
, prince
Weight: 0.65
, captain
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at constellation 1.00
be a part of constellation 0.99
be at galaxy 0.76
be a part of galaxy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(star, be at constellation)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(star, be a part of constellation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(star, be a part of constellation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(star, be a part of constellation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(star, be at galaxy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(star, be a part of galaxy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(star, be at galaxy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(star, be a part of constellation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(star, be a part of galaxy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(star, be at galaxy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(star, be a part of galaxy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(star, be a part of galaxy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(star, be at galaxy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(star, be at constellation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(star, be at constellation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(star, be at constellation)