starbucks: be closed in houston

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed in houston 1.00
be in aberdeen nc closed 0.83
be in north augusta closed 0.82
be closed for day 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(starbucks, be closed in houston)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be in north augusta closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(starbucks, be in north augusta closed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be in north augusta closed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be in aberdeen nc closed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(starbucks, be in aberdeen nc closed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be in aberdeen nc closed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be closed for day)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(starbucks, be in north augusta closed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(starbucks, be closed for day)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(starbucks, be in aberdeen nc closed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be closed for day)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(starbucks, be closed for day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be closed in houston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(starbucks, be closed in houston)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(starbucks, be closed in houston)