starbucks: be expensive in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in china 1.00
be popular in china 0.93
is expensive 0.82
succeed in china 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(convenience store, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(grocery store, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(starbucks, be expensive in china)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(starbucks, succeed in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be popular in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(starbucks, be popular in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(starbucks, succeed in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(starbucks, be popular in china)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(starbucks, succeed in china)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be popular in china)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(starbucks, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, succeed in china)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(convenience store, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(starbucks, be expensive in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)