starbucks: is successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful 1.00
be successful in past 40 years 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(company, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(brand, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(company, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(brand, is successful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(company, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(company, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is successful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(brand, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pepsi, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pepsi, is successful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(convenience store, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, is successful)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be successful in past 40 years)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is successful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(company, is successful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pepsi, is successful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(convenience store, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(brand, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(company, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)