starvation: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cruelty
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, dehydration
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is good thing 0.97
is thing 0.94
is same thing 0.89
be bad for world 0.83
feel good 0.80
is big problem 0.80
affect things 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
be problem for people 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, is same thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hunger, feel good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(famine, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cruelty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(dehydration, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hunger, feel good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hunger, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(dehydration, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(famine, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(famine, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, be problem for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(starvation, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(starvation, is thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(starvation, is thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(starvation, is thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(starvation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(starvation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(starvation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(starvation, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dehydration, is bad thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(famine, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dehydration, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dehydration, be problem for people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(starvation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cruelty, has quality bad)