starvation: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cruelty
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, dehydration
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is important issue 0.97
be issue in world 0.92
is global issue 0.87
be such issue in world 0.87
is justice issue 0.82
be issue for victims 0.80
regard cross issues resolved 0.79
has state problem 0.78
regard cross issues resolved in workplace 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be issue in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is important issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, is global issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, is issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(starvation, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(famine, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(famine, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dehydration, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dehydration, is issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hunger, is issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hunger, be issue in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be issue in world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hunger, be such issue in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hunger, is important issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hunger, is important issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(famine, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(famine, is global issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(starvation, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is global issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(starvation, is global issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, is global issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(starvation, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(starvation, is global issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dehydration, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be issue in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hunger, be such issue in world)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hunger, is important issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(famine, is global issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dehydration, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)