state highway: be maintain with state fund

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents road
Weight: 0.77
, route
Weight: 0.61
, roadway
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.57
, construction
Weight: 0.53
Siblings highway
Weight: 0.79
, interstate highway
Weight: 0.41
, national highway
Weight: 0.41
, toll road
Weight: 0.38
, turnpike
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be maintain with state fund 1.00
be well maintain 0.80
be at state 0.80
be a part of state 0.79
be at any state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(city, be a part of state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interstate highway, be at state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(highway, be at state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(toll road, be well maintain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(national highway, be well maintain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(city, be a part of state)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(national highway, be well maintain)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(national highway, be well maintain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(interstate highway, be at state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(interstate highway, be at state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(highway, be at state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(highway, be at state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(toll road, be well maintain)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(toll road, be well maintain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(state highway, be maintain with state fund)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(state highway, be at state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(state highway, be at any state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be at state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be at any state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(state highway, be at any state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(state highway, be at any state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(state highway, be at state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(state highway, be at state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(national highway, be well maintain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(toll road, be well maintain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(highway, be at state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interstate highway, be at state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(state highway, be maintain with state fund)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)