state: be admitted to union

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents united states
Weight: 0.68
, nation
Weight: 0.68
, district
Weight: 0.67
, municipality
Weight: 0.67
Siblings county
Weight: 0.69
, united state
Weight: 0.67
, police department
Weight: 0.67
, free state
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be admitted to union 1.00
be admitted in to union 1.00
get admitted to union 0.99
be admited to union 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(state, be admitted to union)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(state, be admitted in to union)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(state, be admitted in to union)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(state, get admitted to union)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(state, be admitted in to union)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(state, get admitted to union)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(state, be admitted in to union)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(state, be admited to union)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(state, be admited to union)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(state, be admited to union)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(state, get admitted to union)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(state, get admitted to union)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(state, be admited to union)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(state, be admitted to union)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(state, be admitted to union)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(state, be admitted to union)