statement: be like these

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.70
, declaration
Weight: 0.68
, confession
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.75
, disclaimer
Weight: 0.65
, press
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.65
, recommendation
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like these 1.00
is like 0.84
be like these in user agreements 0.79
be like these in user agreements legal 0.79
were alike 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(confession, is like)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(statement, be like these)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(declaration, were alike)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(statement, be like these)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(declaration, were alike)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(confession, is like)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(confession, is like)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(declaration, were alike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(confession, is like)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(statement, be like these)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(declaration, were alike)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(statement, be like these)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(statement, be like these)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these in user agreements legal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these in user agreements)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(statement, be like these in user agreements)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(statement, be like these in user agreements)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(statement, be like these in user agreements legal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(statement, be like these in user agreements legal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(statement, be like these in user agreements)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(statement, be like these in user agreements legal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(statement, be like these)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(declaration, were alike)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(confession, is like)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(declaration, were alike)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(statement, be like these)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(confession, is like)