statement: compare with reports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.70
, declaration
Weight: 0.68
, confession
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.75
, disclaimer
Weight: 0.65
, press
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.65
, recommendation
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare with reports 1.00
compare with leaked reports 0.90
compare to aeropress 0.82
be important in report 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(press, compare to aeropress)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, be important in report)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(recommendation, be important in report)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(recommendation, be important in report)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(press, compare to aeropress)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(press, compare to aeropress)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(statement, compare with reports)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with leaked reports)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(statement, compare with leaked reports)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(statement, compare with leaked reports)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(statement, compare with leaked reports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(statement, compare with reports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(recommendation, be important in report)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(statement, compare with reports)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(press, compare to aeropress)