stationery: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, product
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, gift
Weight: 0.54
Siblings postage stamp
Weight: 0.33
, electronics
Weight: 0.33
, toy
Weight: 0.32
, dairy product
Weight: 0.32
, toy car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at post office 0.90
be at desk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(postage stamp, be at post office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(postage stamp, be at post office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(postage stamp, be at post office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(stationery, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(stationery, be at post office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stationery, be at post office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(stationery, be at post office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(stationery, be at desk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(stationery, be at post office)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(stationery, be at desk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(stationery, be at desk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stationery, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(stationery, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(stationery, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(stationery, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(postage stamp, be at post office)