statistics: be applied to information technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
Siblings batting average
Weight: 0.69
, poll
Weight: 0.56
, era
Weight: 0.56
, batting
Weight: 0.52
, prevalence
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be applied to information technology 1.00
be classified as technology 0.82
be applied 0.81
be applied in management 0.80
be applied in education 0.79
be applied in educational sector 0.77
be applied in sector 0.77
be applied in sports 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(tool, be classified as technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tool, be classified as technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tool, be classified as technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(tool, be classified as technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied in management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied in education)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied in educational sector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied in sports)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied in sports)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(statistics, be applied in sports)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(statistics, be applied in sports)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(statistics, be applied in management)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied in educational sector)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(statistics, be applied in education)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(statistics, be applied in educational sector)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(statistics, be applied in educational sector)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied in management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(statistics, be applied in management)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(statistics, be applied in education)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied in education)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tool, be classified as technology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(statistics, be applied to information technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tool, be classified as technology)