statistics: is good major

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
Siblings batting average
Weight: 0.69
, poll
Weight: 0.56
, era
Weight: 0.56
, batting
Weight: 0.52
, prevalence
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good major 1.00
is major 0.95
is great 0.82
be such big part of sports 0.79
has quality good 0.78
be important in organisation 0.78
be such big part of american sports 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
differ from greatest common factor 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(factor, differ from greatest common factor)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(era, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(batting, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(statistics, is good major)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(statistics, is good major)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(statistics, is good major)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(factor, differ from greatest common factor)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(statistics, is good major)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(statistics, is good major)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(poll, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poll, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(batting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(batting, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(era, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(era, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(statistics, is good major)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(statistics, is good major)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(factor, differ from greatest common factor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(poll, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(era, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(batting, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(statistics, is good major)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(factor, differ from greatest common factor)