statue: be at central park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.75
, object
Weight: 0.65
, sculpture
Weight: 0.65
, symbol
Weight: 0.63
, sign
Weight: 0.61
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.40
, museum
Weight: 0.37
, temple
Weight: 0.37
, fountain
Weight: 0.36
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at central park 1.00
be at park 0.84
be at state park 0.83
be at municipal park 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monument, be at municipal park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monument, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sign, be at state park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monument, be at state park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monument, be at municipal park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(monument, be at state park)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monument, be at municipal park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(national monument, be at state park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(monument, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(statue, be at central park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(statue, be at central park)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(monument, be at municipal park)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(statue, be at central park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(national monument, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(national monument, be at state park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(statue, be at central park)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(statue, be at state park)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(statue, be at park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(statue, be at state park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(statue, be at park)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(statue, be at state park)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at state park)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(statue, be at park)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(monument, be at state park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sign, be at state park)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monument, be at municipal park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national monument, be at state park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(monument, be at state park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sign, be at state park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(statue, be at central park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monument, be at municipal park)