statue: be considered wonder

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.75
, object
Weight: 0.65
, idol
Weight: 0.65
, sculpture
Weight: 0.65
, figure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings national monument
Weight: 0.40
, memorial
Weight: 0.37
, obelisk
Weight: 0.37
, museum
Weight: 0.37
, temple
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered wonder 1.00
be wonder of world 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(temple, be considered wonder)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(temple, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(temple, be considered wonder)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(statue, be considered wonder)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(statue, be wonder of world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(statue, be wonder of world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(statue, be wonder of world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(statue, be wonder of world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(statue, be considered wonder)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(statue, be considered wonder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(statue, be considered wonder)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(temple, be considered wonder)