status: go compete

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings citizenship
Weight: 0.32
, integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, real number
Weight: 0.32
, rank
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
go compete 1.00
go compete with kick 0.91
compete with kick 0.88
come up in excel 0.81
work in competitive 0.79
show excel 0.77
be in competitive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(issue, be in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(status, go compete)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(value, come up in excel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(status, go compete)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(value, come up in excel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(issue, be in competitive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in competitive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(value, come up in excel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rank, work in competitive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(issue, be in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(status, go compete)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(value, come up in excel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(status, go compete)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rank, work in competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rank, work in competitive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(status, go compete)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete with kick)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(status, go compete with kick)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(status, go compete with kick)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(status, compete with kick)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(status, compete with kick)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(status, compete with kick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(status, go compete with kick)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(status, compete with kick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(status, go compete)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(value, come up in excel)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be in competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rank, work in competitive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(value, come up in excel)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(status, go compete) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be in competitive)