status: has quality class

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings citizenship
Weight: 0.32
, integrity
Weight: 0.32
, loyalty
Weight: 0.32
, real number
Weight: 0.32
, rank
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality class 1.00
is quality 0.84
has quality good 0.82
is protected class 0.80
is good quality 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
is important quality 0.80
has quality worth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(status, has quality class)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(citizenship, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rank, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is good quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(citizenship, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(citizenship, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loyalty, is important quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(status, has quality class)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(loyalty, is quality)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(integrity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(integrity, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loyalty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(loyalty, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(loyalty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loyalty, is important quality)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is important quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(citizenship, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(citizenship, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(citizenship, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(citizenship, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(loyalty, is good quality)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(loyalty, is good quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(citizenship, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(citizenship, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rank, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rank, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(status, has quality class)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(status, is protected class)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(status, is protected class)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(status, is protected class)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(status, is protected class)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(status, has quality class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(integrity, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(loyalty, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loyalty, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loyalty, is important quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(loyalty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(citizenship, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(citizenship, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(loyalty, is good quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(citizenship, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rank, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)