steak: be expensive in restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in restaurants 1.00
prepared in restaurants 0.88
be in stores more costly 0.80
be in stores costly 0.80
be in stores more costly today 0.80
be in stores costly today 0.80
be cheaper at outlets 0.79
be in outlet stores cheaper 0.78
is expensive 0.78
be more expensive than chicken 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(item, be cheaper at outlets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper at outlets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper at outlets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(item, be cheaper at outlets)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(steak, be expensive in restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, prepared in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(steak, prepared in restaurants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(steak, prepared in restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(steak, prepared in restaurants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(steak, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(steak, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(steak, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(steak, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper at outlets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper at outlets)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(steak, be expensive in restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)