steak: be more expensive than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings filet
Weight: 0.72
, flank
Weight: 0.43
, fillet
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than beef 1.00
be more expensive than chicken 0.90
is 108 beef 0.89
is beef 0.89
be called beef 0.88
is 108 rare beef 0.86
get more expensive 0.83
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.83
is meat 0.80
is best meat 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(flank, is beef)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(flank, is beef)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(flank, is beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(steak, be called beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(steak, is meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(steak, be called beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(steak, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(steak, is meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(steak, be called beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(steak, is best meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(steak, is best meat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steak, is meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(steak, be called beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(steak, is best meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(steak, is best meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(flank, is beef)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)