steak: taste good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.74
, entree
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
Siblings tenderloin
Weight: 0.50
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, lasagna
Weight: 0.38
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, sushi
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
be delicious and fill and very healthy 0.76
be both beautiful and delicious 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sushi, be both beautiful and delicious)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sushi, be delicious and fill and very healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sushi, be both beautiful and delicious)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sushi, be both beautiful and delicious)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sushi, be delicious and fill and very healthy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sushi, be delicious and fill and very healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(steak, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steak, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sushi, be delicious and fill and very healthy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sushi, be both beautiful and delicious)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(steak, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)