steakhouse: be at florida

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, place
Weight: 0.49
, business
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.43
, location
Weight: 0.40
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, deli
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at florida 1.00
be at michigan 0.85
be at texas 0.83
be at america 0.81
be at boston 0.79
be at chicago 0.78
be at nyc 0.78
be at maine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at maine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at maine)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(french restaurant, be at nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be at nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be at florida)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at maine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at maine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be at nyc)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at maine)