steel: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
be better for cars 0.75
is stronger 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(alloy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alloy, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(alloy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(metal, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alloy, is stronger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(alloy, is stronger)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alloy, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(metal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(alloy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(heavy metal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alloy, is stronger)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(aluminum, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(steel, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(steel, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(steel, has quality good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(steel, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(steel, is stronger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steel, is stronger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(steel, is stronger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(steel, is stronger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(steel, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(alloy, is stronger)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alloy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heavy metal, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(metal, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(alloy, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(steel, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(alloy, is stronger)