steel: melt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.68
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, alloy
Weight: 0.61
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings steel wool
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
melt 1.00
take time melt 0.93
be prevented from melting with heat of molten iron 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(metal, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(steel, melt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(metal, melt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(metal, melt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(metal, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(steel, melt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(steel, melt)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(steel, take time melt)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(steel, take time melt)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(steel, take time melt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(steel, take time melt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(steel, melt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(steel, melt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(metal, melt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(steel, melt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(metal, melt)