step: be 3 at bottom of importance for pds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings move
Weight: 0.67
, appointment
Weight: 0.67
, challenge
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, planning
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 3 at bottom of importance for pds 1.00
be 3 at bottom of importance 0.94
be 3 at bottom for pds 0.91
be 3 at bottom 0.84
be key on vivoactive 3 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(action, be key on vivoactive 3)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(action, be key on vivoactive 3)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(action, be key on vivoactive 3)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(action, be key on vivoactive 3)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(step, be 3 at bottom for pds)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom for pds)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom for pds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(step, be 3 at bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom for pds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(action, be key on vivoactive 3)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(step, be 3 at bottom of importance for pds)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(action, be key on vivoactive 3)