step: be in method important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings move
Weight: 0.67
, appointment
Weight: 0.67
, challenge
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, planning
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in method important 1.00
be in method 0.97
be in scientific method important 0.91
be in scientific method 0.88
be in scientific methods 0.81
be important to process 0.80
is is process 0.76
be necessary in system 0.75
is effective 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(planning, is effective)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(planning, is is process)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(planning, be necessary in system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(planning, is is process)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(planning, is is process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(planning, be necessary in system)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(planning, be necessary in system)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(planning, is effective)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(planning, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in method important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(step, be in method)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(step, be in method)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(step, be in method)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific method important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific method)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific methods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific methods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific methods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific methods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(step, be in method important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(planning, is is process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(planning, be necessary in system)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(planning, is effective)