steve jobs: was important to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, genius
Weight: 0.63
, ceo
Weight: 0.63
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.63
Siblings steve
Weight: 0.36
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to technology 1.00
was work important 0.79
be important to world 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(steve jobs, was important to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was work important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, be important to world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(steve jobs, was work important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(steve jobs, be important to world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, was work important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, be important to world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was work important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(steve jobs, be important to world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was important to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(steve jobs, was important to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was important to technology)