stew: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.73
, recipe
Weight: 0.63
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.61
, leftovers
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.38
, lasagna
Weight: 0.37
, gumbo
Weight: 0.37
, petri dish
Weight: 0.37
, chili
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worth 0.82
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
be bad company work for 0.79
be bad for game 0.78
be bad company work 0.78
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leftovers, go bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(leftovers, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, go bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, taste good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chili, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chili, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chili, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(tomato sauce, taste good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(leftovers, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dish, be bad company work)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(leftovers, go bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stew, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lasagna, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gumbo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gumbo, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chili, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(chili, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chili, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chili, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chili, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chili, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(stew, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stew, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leftovers, go bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lasagna, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gumbo, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chili, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chili, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chili, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(leftovers, go bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leftovers, taste bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stew, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, taste good)