stick: be used to hit ball

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, solid
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hockey stick
Weight: 0.64
, glue stick
Weight: 0.37
, pencil
Weight: 0.33
, hammer
Weight: 0.33
, keep
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to hit ball 1.00
be used to hit 0.87
be used to hit nail 0.79
hit nail 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hammer, hit nail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hammer, be used to hit nail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hammer, be used to hit nail)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hammer, be used to hit nail)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hammer, hit nail)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hammer, hit nail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(stick, be used to hit ball)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(stick, be used to hit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(stick, be used to hit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(stick, be used to hit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(stick, be used to hit ball)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hammer, be used to hit nail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to hit ball)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hammer, hit nail)