:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
hurt |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(shame, hurt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hangover, hurt)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(shame, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shame, hurt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hangover, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hangover, hurt)
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sting, hurt)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sting, hurt)
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sting, hurt)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(shame, hurt)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sting, hurt)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hangover, hurt)