stock market: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equity
Weight: 0.72
, stock
Weight: 0.69
, financial institution
Weight: 0.68
, market
Weight: 0.61
Siblings volatility
Weight: 0.55
, stock option
Weight: 0.39
, investor
Weight: 0.35
, marketplace
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
do good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(equity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(market, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(market, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stock market, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(equity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stock market, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(stock market, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stock market, do good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stock market, do good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(stock market, do good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stock market, do good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stock market, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equity, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equity, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(stock market, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(market, has quality good)