stock: be better than bonds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than bonds 1.00
be harder than bonds 0.94
be riskier than bonds 0.91
be more volatile than bonds 0.90
have more potential for higher returns than bonds 0.89
outperform bonds 0.82
be better than equity 0.80
be different from good debt 0.80
be different from debt 0.78
be less expensive than equity 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debt, be better than equity)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt, be different from good debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt, be different from good debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be different from good debt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debt, be better than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be better than equity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(stock, be better than bonds)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stock, be better than bonds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, be better than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be different from good debt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)