stock: be more expensive than preferred stock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than preferred stock 1.00
be different from preferred stock 0.93
be less expensive than equity 0.87
be more expensive than equity 0.87
be cheaper form than equity 0.84
be cheaper than equity wso 0.84
be cheaper than equity 0.84
be preferred over equity 0.83
be less risky than equity 0.83
be comparatively cheaper form than equity 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(debt, be preferred over equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(debt, be preferred over equity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(debt, be preferred over equity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, be different from preferred stock)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(stock, be different from preferred stock)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(stock, be different from preferred stock)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(stock, be different from preferred stock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more expensive than preferred stock)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(debt, be preferred over equity)