stock: have more potential for higher returns than bonds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more potential for higher returns than bonds 1.00
be better than bonds 0.89
be harder than bonds 0.86
be riskier than bonds 0.85
be more volatile than bonds 0.85
be with high returns 0.84
be with returns 0.82
be less expensive than equity 0.79
be less risky than equity 0.79
be more expensive than equity 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, be with high returns)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(investment, be with high returns)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(investment, be with high returns)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(investment, be with high returns)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(stock, be better than bonds)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stock, be better than bonds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(stock, be better than bonds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(investment, be with high returns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(investment, be with high returns)