stomach: is lining

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small intestine
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.65
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.59
, tumor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gastric ulcer
Weight: 0.64
, flatulence
Weight: 0.50
, abdomen
Weight: 0.36
, chest
Weight: 0.35
, large intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is lining 1.00
be lined with villi 0.78
be lined with cedar 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(small intestine, be lined with villi)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(stomach, is lining)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(small intestine, be lined with villi)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, be lined with villi)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chest, be lined with cedar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(small intestine, be lined with villi)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(stomach, is lining)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chest, be lined with cedar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chest, be lined with cedar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(stomach, is lining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is lining)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(stomach, is lining)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(small intestine, be lined with villi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chest, be lined with cedar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(stomach, is lining)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(small intestine, be lined with villi)