stone: be in building important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in building important 1.00
be in building 0.95
is good building material 0.86
was for pyramid transportated to building site 0.81
get on top of buildings 0.80
be transported to building site 0.79
was for pyramid transported to building site 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, be in building important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(stone, be in building)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stone, be in building)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stone, is good building material)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(stone, be transported to building site)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(stone, be transported to building site)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(stone, be transported to building site)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(stone, be in building important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)