stone: be transported to building site

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be transported to building site 1.00
was for pyramid transported to building site 0.92
were brought to site 0.84
be in building 0.82
was for pyramid transportated to building site 0.81
be in building important 0.79
is good building material 0.78
were transported from wales to stonehenge 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(stone, be transported to building site)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(stone, be in building)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stone, be in building)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stone, were brought to site)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(stone, were brought to site)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(stone, be in building important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(stone, were brought to site)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, were transported from wales to stonehenge)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stone, is good building material)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, be in building important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(stone, were transported from wales to stonehenge)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, were transported from wales to stonehenge)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(stone, were brought to site)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(stone, were transported from wales to stonehenge)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(stone, be transported to building site)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)