stone: get on top of buildings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get on top of buildings 1.00
be in building 0.81
be in building important 0.80
be put on flat roofs 0.79
was for pyramid transportated to building site 0.77
is good building material 0.76
was for pyramid transported to building site 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(stone, be put on flat roofs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(stone, be put on flat roofs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(stone, be put on flat roofs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(stone, be in building)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(stone, be put on flat roofs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stone, be in building)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(stone, be in building important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stone, is good building material)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, be in building important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)