stone: was cutting important to ancient egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was cutting important to ancient egyptians 1.00
were from ancient egypt 0.83
were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)