stone: were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt 1.00
were from ancient egypt 0.90
was for pyramid transportated to building site 0.81
was for pyramid transported to building site 0.79
was cutting important to ancient egyptians 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(stone, was cutting important to ancient egyptians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(stone, were for pyramid numbered in ancient egypt)