stop: going full screen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, policy
Weight: 0.56
Siblings stop sign
Weight: 0.71
, bus stop
Weight: 0.36
, street sign
Weight: 0.33
, stopping
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
going full screen 1.00
going complete full screen 0.96
going screen 0.95
going complete screen 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(stop, going full screen)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(stop, going screen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stop, going screen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(stop, going complete full screen)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(stop, going complete screen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(stop, going complete full screen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stop, going complete screen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(stop, going complete full screen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(stop, going complete screen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stop, going complete full screen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stop, going complete screen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(stop, going screen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stop, going screen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(stop, going full screen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(stop, going full screen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(stop, going full screen)