stop: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, policy
Weight: 0.56
Siblings stop sign
Weight: 0.71
, bus stop
Weight: 0.36
, street sign
Weight: 0.33
, stopping
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
is early bad 0.78
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stopping, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stopping, is early bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(stopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(stopping, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(stopping, is early bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(stopping, is early bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(stop, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(stop, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stop, has quality wrong)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stop, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(stop, has quality wrong)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stop, has quality wrong)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stop, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(stopping, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stopping, is early bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(stop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)