storage: be divided among multiple users

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents management
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, use
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings warehouse
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33
, convenience store
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be divided among multiple users 1.00
be divided among users 0.97
be divided among multiple users of linux 0.93
be divided among users of linux 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(storage, be divided among multiple users of linux)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(storage, be divided among users of linux)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(storage, be divided among users)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users of linux)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(storage, be divided among users)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(storage, be divided among users of linux)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(storage, be divided among users)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(storage, be divided among users)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users of linux)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(storage, be divided among users of linux)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users of linux)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(storage, be divided among users of linux)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(storage, be divided among multiple users)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(storage, be divided among multiple users) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(storage, be divided among multiple users)