storage: be from digital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents management
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, use
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings warehouse
Weight: 0.33
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.33
, convenience store
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from digital 1.00
be from western digital 0.91
be from digital cheap 0.91
be from western digital cheap 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(storage, be from digital)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(storage, be from digital cheap)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(storage, be from western digital)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(storage, be from western digital cheap)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(storage, be from digital cheap)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(storage, be from western digital)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storage, be from western digital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(storage, be from digital cheap)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(storage, be from western digital cheap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(storage, be from western digital cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(storage, be from western digital)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(storage, be from digital cheap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(storage, be from western digital cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(storage, be from digital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(storage, be from digital)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(storage, be from digital)