store: be closed on tuesdays

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents convenience store
Weight: 0.81
, restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, business
Weight: 0.57
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.80
, clothing store
Weight: 0.76
, hardware store
Weight: 0.75
, home depot
Weight: 0.74
, drugstore
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed on tuesdays 1.00
be in paramus closed 0.91
is closed 0.91
be in paramus closed on sunday 0.90
be closed on sunday 0.90
be closed on monday 0.90
be closed today 0.89
be closed on tuesday 0.88
be closed on wednesday 0.87
be closed on july 2 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(store, be in paramus closed on sunday)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(store, be closed today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(store, be closed on sunday)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(store, be closed on monday)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(store, be closed on tuesday)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(store, be closed on wednesday)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(store, be closed on july 2)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(store, be closed today)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(store, be closed today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(store, be in paramus closed on sunday)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on sunday)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(store, be in paramus closed on sunday)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on monday)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(store, be in paramus closed on sunday)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on tuesday)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on wednesday)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on sunday)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on monday)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(store, be closed on sunday)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on wednesday)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesday)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(store, be closed on monday)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(store, be closed on wednesday)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(store, be closed on july 2)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(store, be closed on tuesday)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on july 2)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(store, be closed on july 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(store, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)