storing: be in repository advantageous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.51
, topic
Weight: 0.47
, activity
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings loading
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.32
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, cache
Weight: 0.31
, simple function
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in repository advantageous 1.00
be in central repository advantageous 0.98
be in advantageous 0.82
be in central advantageous 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(storing, be in repository advantageous)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(storing, be in central repository advantageous)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(storing, be in central repository advantageous)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(storing, be in central repository advantageous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(storing, be in advantageous)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(storing, be in central advantageous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(storing, be in advantageous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(storing, be in central advantageous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(storing, be in central advantageous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(storing, be in advantageous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(storing, be in advantageous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(storing, be in central repository advantageous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(storing, be in central advantageous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(storing, be in repository advantageous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(storing, be in repository advantageous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(storing, be in repository advantageous)